I think that the Delhi agreement is, in my opinion, an incomplete approach, but a corrective one. Representatives of the Kashmir government debated with indian government representatives and agreed on an agreement to approve the main decisions of the J&K Constituent Assembly. This agreement was later known as the Delhi Agreement, 1952. The main features of this agreement were as follows: the Treaty entered into force on 8 August 1973 and ended on 1 July 1974. As part of the agreement, UNHCR monitored the repatriation of citizens from Bangladesh and Pakistan. According to the UN, 121,695 Bengals have been relocated from Pakistan to Bangladesh. These included senior Bengali officials and military officers. 108,744 non-Bengali civilians and civil servants were transferred from Bangladesh to Pakistan.  India released 6500 Pakistani prisoners, most of them transported by train to Pakistan.  In 1974, General Niazi was the last Pakistani officer to be symbolically returned across the Wagah border.  Finally, on 7 Falgun 2007, King Tribhuban returned to Nepal as head of state, thus ending rana rule. This agreement was one of the main stepping stones for the transfer of government power from autocratic families to ordinary people. The Delhi Agreement was a tripartite (oral) agreement in Delhi, after mutual agreement between Ranas, the Nepali Congress Party and King Tribhuban.
[Citation required] Although the agreement required the repatriation of Urdu-speaking Biharis to Bangladesh, the Pakistani Government withdrew its promise to establish the Community in Pakistan.  This is where the stranded stateless Pakistani community in Bangladesh was born. The Delhi Agreement of 2007 B.S. is a very important historical event that has brought to a successful end the progress of the anti-Rana movement. After King Tribhuvan cleverly fled to Delhi with the risk of his throne in Nepal, the agreement was maintained in Delhi under the aegis of the Indian government and the presence of the king, the Congress axis and Rana representatives. It is even referred to as a tripartite agreement. Here are the following points: Delhi Agreement was concluded between King Tribhuvan, Nepalese Congress and Ranas. The two provisions of the Delhi agreement were: Dr. KI Singh opposed this agreement.
He did not want any part of the rana regime to remain in power and wanted to ban them completely. He announced that the revolution would not stop in the western areas where he was in charge. He did not stop the revolution and despised King Tribhuwan`s message to stop. That`s why he was tried for treason. The parties that signed the Delhi Agreement in 2007 were the Nepalese Congress, King Tribhuwan and the Ranas. The tripartite agreement was the agreement between the king, the Ranas and the Nepalese Congress, negotiated in 2007 by the Indian government in New Delhi, Falgun. Among the prisoners of war, 195 Pakistani military officers detained in India were identified as the main suspects of war crimes. Pakistan insisted that they be released as one of its main demands. It urged several Muslim countries to hold back bangladesh`s recognition until the 195 officers were released.
 India supported his repatriation to Pakistan. In the text of the agreement, Kamal Hossain, Minister of Foreign Affairs of Bangladesh, said that he fully agreed with the position of Sadar-i-Riyasat; Although sadar-i-Riyasat was elected by the state legislature, it had to be recognized as such by the President of India before being sworn in; in other Indian States, the Head of State was appointed by the President and, as such, was his candidate, but the person to be appointed as head had to be a person acceptable to the Government of that State; no person who is not acceptable to the Land Government may be imposed on the State as Head. . . .