Archiv für den Tag: 24. September 2021

Jadwal Film Wedding Agreement Semarang

Refal Hady in the movie Wedding Agreement will play Byantara Wicaksana (Bian) in the movie Ria Ricis as Amy. The time to see a movie while eating noodles in Archie`s hands was cute. The film`s dialogues, which deviate from Mia Chuz`s story, do not seem condescending, but rather sniffing. Talk about the cause of the disease when you are asked to pray at dawn, but the turn of being able to call by mobile phone suddenly heals, unambiguously, Menev`s consciousness. From here, we know that Archie knows very well where the marriage agreement is going. It`s nice to see the headliners of this film bringing a domestic drama to life and making jokes on occasion. This joke taught us that Bian and Tari have a strong chemistry. This makes the audience understandable with the end of the story. Patiently, Tari Bian approached until she finally melted.

He also invited Bian to hijrah and lived a life in accordance with the sharia of the religion. „It`s such an emotional film,“ said producer Chand Parwez. Another hilarious scene where the secret of sharing the couple`s bed is almost revealed. Refal`s expression was really hilarious. On the other hand, Indah`s panic, which was trying to manage the situation, left a beak. Another advantage of the film is that Archie`s flexibility in polishing the „Home“ scene becomes romantic. Mia had offered her novel story to several film production houses, but was rejected until Starvision Plus filmed the content of this novel in 2019. [3] In the evening, Tari walked with Ami to watch, but Bian banished them and asked Tari to accompany him to see a romantic movie at home (with a clip of the movie Romeo + Rinjani).

When there is a kissing scene in the movie that is seen, Tari closes his eyes and immediately goes into the room, but is restrained by Bian, and Bian is back to Bian`s room, where they finally make love. After that, they kept watching. If a separate scene is shown in the film, Tari says that if they ever separate, Tari will pray that Allah will reunite them. Bian receives a call from Sarah saying he has another accident and is being treated. At first, Bian doesn`t want to go get him, but Tari allows it. The scene of the film ends with the wedding scene of Aldi and Sarah. Wedding Agreement is a 2019 Starvision Plus Indonesian drama, directed by Archie Hekagery, based on the eponymous novel by Eria Chuzaimiah aka Mia Chuz, which was first popular on Wattpad. Wedding Agreement Trailer involves a big feeling of drama. At first, the audience may suspect that this film resembles the verse of love or heaven that are not missed. Unexpectedly, Wedding Agreement offers a pretty strong element of comedy.

Thus are the different titles of the film that are screened today in the cinemas of the city of Semarang. TRIBUNJATENG.COM – For those of you who have a hobby of watching, here is a schedule of screenings in Semarang cinemas today. Below is a list of IMDB-based castings[4]: For those of you who want to take the time to watch horror, romance, and adventure movies in theaters, the above schedule can be used as a recommendation. (*) Wedding Agreement is expected to be released on August 8, 2019. . .

Iran Nuclear Agreement Crs

Another public letter to Congress seeking approval of the agreement was signed by a bipartisan group of more than 60 „national security leaders,“ including politicians, retired military officers and diplomats. [227] In this July 20, 2015 letter, it says, „We congratulate President Obama and all negotiators on a pioneering agreement unprecedented in its importance to prevent Iran from acquiring nuclear weapons. We have closely followed the negotiations as they have progressed and conclude that the JCPOA represents greater security for us and our partners in the region. [227] [229] Among the Republicans who signed this letter were former Treasury Secretary Paul O`Neill, former U.S. Trade Representative Carla Anderson Hills, and former Senator Nancy Landon Kassebaum. [227] Among the Democrats who signed the letter were former Secretary of State Madeleine Albright, former Senate Majority Leader George J. Mitchell and Tom Daschle, former Senator Carl Levin, and former Secretary of Defense William Perry. [227] [230] Former national security advisers Zbigniew Brzezinski and Brent Scowcroft were also signed; Among secretaries of state R. Nicholas Burns and Thomas R. Pickering; U.S. Ambassadors Ryan Crocker and Stuart Eizenstat; Admiral Eric T. Olson; Under Secretary of State for Defence Policy, Michele Flournoy; and Assistant Secretary of Non-Proliferation Robert Einhorn. [230] On September 10, the day before the vote, Mr.

Boehner threatened „to use any instrument at our disposal to stop, slow down and delay the full implementation of this agreement,“ saying that Republican action in the House against the president (who claimed that the Iran nuclear deal was not respected) „is an option that is very possible.“ [336] [338] Four months later, House Republicans dropped plans to sue the government for the JCPOA. [339] In the same August 5 speech, Obama said, „Just because Iranians are chanting death for America does not mean that all Iranians believe it. In fact, it is these hardliners who are most comfortable with the status quo. It was those tough people who chanted „Death for America“ who were most opposed to the deal. They are making common cause with the Republican caucus. [198] [200] Republican leaders in Congress criticized this statement. Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell called it „blatant political rhetoric,“ which is a strategy to „demonize your opponents, demonize the base, anger Democrats and rally around the president.“ McConnell said, „This is a huge national security debate that the president will leave behind in a year and a half, in accordance with the Constitution, and the rest of us will deal with the consequences. So I`d like him to stir up the rhetoric and talk about the facts,“ and I promised that Republicans would respectfully discuss the deal in September. [201] [202] Republican Senator Bob Corker, the chairman of the Foreign Relations Committee, claimed that the chairman was „trying to end the debate by saying that those who have legitimate questions have legitimate questions, are somehow unasyriotic, somehow compared to extremists in Iran.“ [203] Obama stuck to his testimony, with White House spokesman Josh Earnest calling it a „factual finding“[201] and Obama said in an interview: „Remember what I said is that it is the Iranian extremists who are most opposed to this deal.

Integrative Agreements Occur

There has been no work that has looked at different ways of getting negotiators to think more abstractly during negotiations. Nevertheless, it is possible to extrapolate from abstraction research how such changes might occur. For example, one might expect that people who focus on general characteristics (e.g.B. hard, generous) and not on certain behaviours (e.g.B. concessions, arguments) would instead adopt a more abstract construction during negotiation (see Semin & Fiedler, 1988). In addition, one might expect that those considering trading options would contain non-orientable (non-comparable) and non-orientable options, which, during trading, would instead adopt a more abstract interpretation, namely because characteristics that are not directly comparable would require abstraction to make a decision based on unobservable characteristics (see Johnson, 1984; Malkoc, Magicien et Ulu, 2005). Of course, one of the most direct possibilities where negotiators` interpretation can vary is to think more abstractly about negotiation issues by concentrating topics in more general, more specific terms. For example, if the work is negotiated with management, they might think about the issues that are important to them (for example.B. Health insurance, salary, leave, sick leave, claims procedures) as „ways to support a family“ rather than through the specific alternatives available. Of course, the nature of the issue taken into consideration during a negotiation has a profound influence on the quality of the concessions obtained during a negotiation. Negotiators, in particular, who examine topics in a piecemeal manner, tend to make concessions, whether a topic is of low or high value (Pruitt, 1981). Such an interpretation allows a presentation of the themes that distinguishes or maintains more clearly the themes defined for the negotiation (high priority) and those that do not define (low priority), which undoubtedly facilitates the logrolling process and the beneficial results for both parties when the problems have an inclusive potential (trade-off).